﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>External Bomb Racks--B-17F</title><link>http://forum.armyairforces.com/</link><description /><copyright>(c) ArmyAirForces</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><item><title>Re: RE: External Bomb Racks--B-17F (ramc181)</title><description>  I cropped this from part of one of my reference files showing how the external rack was used: &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; &lt;img src="http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k227/ramc181/Wingrack2.jpg"&gt; &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; All the best, &lt;br&gt; Paul </description><link>http://forum.armyairforces.com/fb.ashx?m=158180</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:37:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RE: External Bomb Racks--B-17F (billrunnels)</title><description>  Please send it to: &lt;a href="mailto:billrunnels@yahoo.com"&gt;billrunnels@yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Thanks.......... </description><link>http://forum.armyairforces.com/fb.ashx?m=158179</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:23:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>RE: External Bomb Racks--B-17F (jimvaught)</title><description>  I have a very high-resolution digital scan of the photo you mention.&amp;nbsp; looks like the 410th BS of the 94th BG....&amp;nbsp; Virgin's Delight (42-3352) is the prominent a/c in the photo.&amp;nbsp; all six appear to be carrying what look to be (at least) 1000-pounders.&amp;nbsp; I can post it on my blog and provide a link... or email it to you in full-resolution so that you can post it in a way of your choosing.&amp;nbsp; just let me know, &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; cheers, &lt;br&gt; Jim </description><link>http://forum.armyairforces.com/fb.ashx?m=158161</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:44:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RE: External Bomb Racks--B-17F (jimvaught)</title><description>  Glad you liked it Bill,&amp;nbsp; I have another of the 94th BG. a whole formation with what looks like 1000-pounders under the wings.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; can email it or post on my blog...whichever you prefer.&amp;nbsp;  &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; Jim </description><link>http://forum.armyairforces.com/fb.ashx?m=158160</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:37:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title> RE: External Bomb Racks--B-17F (billrunnels)</title><description>  Thanks for sharing the under wing bombs photo! </description><link>http://forum.armyairforces.com/fb.ashx?m=152031</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:19:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title> RE: External Bomb Racks--B-17F (jimvaught)</title><description>  &amp;nbsp; just for the heck of it, here's a shot of 'the old standby' 42-2178 of the 91st BG (322nd Squadron) &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; on 9-16-43&amp;nbsp;taking off&amp;nbsp;with a pair of bombs on the racks underneath.&amp;nbsp; happened to run across this in my files after seeing your post the other day.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; not sure how this photo thing works yet....but if it doesnt come out on the post, here's a temporary link to it : &lt;a href="http://wastedtimeandmoney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://wastedtimeandmoney.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;will be at the top of that page for at least a week or two, or&amp;nbsp;until i can figure out a better way to copy it and post it here.  &lt;br&gt;  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- &lt;br&gt;  well, it didnt show up on the post...&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; obviously i'm still doing something wrong ! &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;   </description><link>http://forum.armyairforces.com/fb.ashx?m=152025</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:51:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title> RE: External Bomb Racks--B-17F (jimvaught)</title><description>  &lt;a href="http://forum.armyairforces.com/showProfile.aspx?memid=4562" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;wcarah&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;  Well, you learn something new every day.&amp;nbsp; There sure must have been a big pile of those things laying around somewhere.&amp;nbsp; Did the groups fly to England with these things still attached ?&amp;nbsp; My father told me that B-17's did &lt;i&gt;everything&lt;/i&gt; at 150 mph, but it might have been slower with bombs slung under the wing. &lt;br&gt;  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- &lt;br&gt;  lol, Warren. &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  speaking of piles of the things lying around.... i have 3 sets of them lying around in 1/48 scale if anyone wants any.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp;you cant order any replacement stuff for those old "F" revell kits anymore....but i have a few loose items leftover from several builds. &lt;br&gt;   </description><link>http://forum.armyairforces.com/fb.ashx?m=151662</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:48:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title> RE: External Bomb Racks--B-17F (jpeters140)</title><description>  I think you must have missed my point...the PROVISIONS were there for the underwing bomb racks, and there were only a few missions flown with the actual bombs loaded.  &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  The B-17 could take a a maximum &amp;nbsp;bomb load of some 17,000 lbs for a short distance...the normal bomb load for both the B-17 and B-24 from Italy was the same for both aircraft...either 12 500 lb bombs or 6 1000 lb bombs...the bomb load was the same.  &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  In the Pacific theater, the object was RANGE, and the B-24 shone there, as the missions were flown wtih 2 extra bomb bay tanks in the forward bomb bay and the bomb load in the aft bomb bay.  &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  The early B-17s did not have the Tokio tanks which added another 1080 gals to the original 1700 gals &lt;br&gt;  ..that was a later developement, so there were B-17fF's that had been modified with an extra fuel tank installed in the&amp;nbsp;radio room and another fuel tank in the nose, to extend the range, with the fuel tanks being fabricated in Australia.  &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  When the B-17s with the tokio tanks were developed, the range on the B-17 and B-24 were close to equal, with the B-24 carrying only about 100 gals more. The normal cunsumption of one engine was&amp;nbsp;50 gals'hour,&amp;nbsp;times 4 = 200 gals/hour. An additional 100 gals over the B-17 meant that only about 25 gals more per engine, which related to not very much additonal range.  &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  While climbing to bombing altitude, the consumption of gasoline in the B-17 was 400 gals /hour, and the CHT's (Cylinder Head Temps) were on the redline. or maximum. &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  Jim :-) </description><link>http://forum.armyairforces.com/fb.ashx?m=139605</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:40:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title> RE: External Bomb Racks--B-17F (wcarah)</title><description>  Well, you learn something new every day.&amp;nbsp; There sure must have been a big pile of those things laying around somewhere.&amp;nbsp; Did the groups fly to England with these things still attached ?&amp;nbsp; My father told me that B-17's did &lt;i&gt;everything&lt;/i&gt; at 150 mph, but it might have been slower with bombs slung under the wing. &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  Regards, </description><link>http://forum.armyairforces.com/fb.ashx?m=139597</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:48:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title> RE: External Bomb Racks--B-17F (jpeters140)</title><description>  According to Roger Freeman and David Osbourne's The Flying Fortress Story, the external bomb rack provisisons were installed on B-17F-20-VE 42-5765 to 41-24539 :B-17F-20-DL 42-3049 to 42-3073 ; and B-17F-BO 20-BO 42-5050 to 42-5078..and all subsequent models including the G series.  &lt;br&gt;  Note..the "Provisions" were installed . &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  On the front cover of The Flying Fortress Story, three aircraft of the Square A bomb group are shown in flight with external racks with it appears 1000 lb bombs attached. (possible 2000 lb ). &lt;br&gt;  On page 51 there are two photos of B-17s with the external racks installed. &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Jim :-) </description><link>http://forum.armyairforces.com/fb.ashx?m=139304</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:30:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title> RE: External Bomb Racks--B-17F (SHAEF1944)</title><description>  B-17F : &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  " A number of other modifications were made, including re-integrating external bomb racks, but because of its negative impact on both rate-of-climb and high altitude flight the configuration was rarely used and the racks were removed. " &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Sounds like the racks were original equipment of the F models that were removed very quickly in combat flying.  &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Model manufacturers normally go by factory drawings and blueprints where available to produce a kit, so sometimes stuff gets included in a model that just got tossed during real use of the aircraft.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; My bet would be a stateside plane about to ship out for overseas would have the racks, but one in a combat squadron would have lost them pretty quickly. </description><link>http://forum.armyairforces.com/fb.ashx?m=139303</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:18:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title> External Bomb Racks--B-17F (wcarah)</title><description>  I am beginning to assemble a 1/48 scale model B-17F made by Monogram/Revell.&amp;nbsp; The kit was made in 1998 and the featured aircraft is the "Memphis Belle."&amp;nbsp; I do not intend to mark the aircraft as the Belle, but I am curious as to the external bomb racks supplied in the kit. &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  I was not aware that bomb groups deployed to England in 1942-43 had external bomb racks.&amp;nbsp; My father flew an "F" for the 381st BG in the summer of 1943, and it certainly did not have the racks shown in the Monogram kit. &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  Were external racks installed in the early 8th Bomber Command groups in England? </description><link>http://forum.armyairforces.com/fb.ashx?m=139298</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:37:19 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>