RE: Ploesti August 1, 1943
-
06/26/2006 04:19:22 PM
According to the article written by Maj. Gen. Philip P. Ardery (who was a Captain at the time of the Ploesti Mission), Killer Kane never achieved rank beyond Colonel, the same rank he held on the day of the mission, despite many years in the service following the war. Why is this? And again, what became of Compton after this mission, the rest of the war, and later on?
Further, in response to my own question, the five men who received the Medal of Honor for this mission (Kane, Baker, Johnson, Jerstad, Hughes) had nothing to do with making the mistake of the wrong turn for the IP. Ardery states that the request for the Medal of Honor awarded to Lt. Pete Hughes was made by Gen. Ent over the objection of the commander of the 389th BG, Col. Jack W. Wood, because he (Wood) was hoping that "he [Wood] might get the medal." Ouch.
Lt. Gen. Edward Timberlake states in his letter to Ardery:
"Keith Compton...had a scheme. He trained one crew to lead the mission to the turning point (IP). In other words, navigate to the IP and initiate the turn to the target. When they made the turn, Keith was to slide into the lead position to the target. All well and good (over planning) except the Navigating Crew's plane exploded over the Adriatic. This made Compton take over the navigation and recognize the IP."
Can this really be true? Is this the way it was done? According to Michael Hill's book, Compton was leading the formation over the Adriatic. Read on.
Statement by B-24 pilot Lt. Guy Iovine:
"A signal was given by Col. Compton for a climb. [Ship # 23 piloted by Iovine] was a little behind at the time. Ship # 28 [Wongo Wongo], piloted by Lt. [Brian W.] Flavelle, was wobbling and made a sharp turn to the left, missing ship # 36 piloted by Lt. [John D.] Palm. [Ship # 23, piloted by Iovine] turned to the right. It seemed as if a/c # 28 stalled the top wing, in turn went into a dive to approximately 1,000 feet. [Ship # 28 Wongo Wongo]...attempted to pull out and went into a tight spiral to the right. He [Flavelle] attempted to pull out of this but went straight into the sea and exploded. A few seconds before the ship hit, three objects come off or out of the ship and struck the water. The plane burned and sank immediately. Smoke rose 900 feet or more. No sign of survivors."
If this account is true, quoted from the mission sortie report of aircraft 41-24258 "Desert Lilly" piloted by Lt. Iovine, then Col. Compton was leading the formation and not trailing Wongo Wongo, as is suggested by the letter written by Timberlake to Ardery. Furthermore, the ship # 28, Wongo Wongo, apparently was leading the second element of six (seven with extra ship) and if ship # 28 was leading the whole formation, then Flavelle would have given the command to climb the formation and not Compton. According to Compton's own mission report he was flying "lead ship in first flight of 'A' section". I'm guessing, from this info, that Compton was leading the mission and not Lt. Flavelle when Ship # 28 Wongo Wongo crashed into the sea. There is no mention in Compton's mission report that the "lead ship" had crashed into the sea.
Some have suggested that Compton's ship was "buried" in the second element of the formation to protect General Ent, who was not supposed to be on board. It should be pointed out that all other Group commanders were flying in the lead ship of the lead elements of their respective formations.
As for the mission going bad, Timberlake says: "I put my finger on the bad guys and the good guys", but Maj. Gen. Lewis H. Brereton said it was too late to bust people because all the requests for medals have been put through to Washington. Timberlake finishes up his letter to Ardery: "I saw no reason to wreck a bunch of lives when it was already too late. How could I have talked to those guys forty-three years later? I keep my bad dreams to myself." Man, this is heavy.
I'd like to type the letter here on the forum, but I don't want to get in trouble with the publishers WWII Magazine. The letter as it appears in the magazine is probably heavily edited. Ardery leaves all of us hanging with his incomplete accounting of the letter and surrounding conversations. When Ardery describes the Ploesti Mission meeting organized by the Eighth Air Force Historical Society, and attended by General Leon Johnson, Maj. Gen. Ramsay Potts and General Jacob Smart (Timberlake refused to attend), he says: "At the meeting there was much discussion [about the mission], but several important questions went unanswered." He then fails to outline what those questions were and the context and content of the discussion. This is frustrating. Ardery then takes another shot at Col. Kane and then goes on to describe how good he feels about his own group's performance on the mission and neglects all of the disturbing points brought out by the letter and his own observations.
I'm not out here to slam any Ploesti veteran or their performance, just looking for the truth and looking for insight from the members of this forum.
Blackie