Alas, Janos and G,
Often the "official" version of what happened may have been written quickly immediately after the debriefings. Often by one or two information officers that have to go through and make sense of all of the conflicting accounts and information. On top of that, we are talking about mechanical typewriters, carbon paper and fumble-fingered typists (such as myself) that make mistakes that are hard to correct. I have seen many official records where the names of the pilots and crews are misspelled or wrong. Aircraft numbers that are incorrect, sometime just off by a digit, sometime way off. And even the target and various IPs incorrect or misspelled so that another location is identified.
Often that kind of mistake is accepted without question by the historian and repeated. Further compounded by later historians that are lazy or sloppy in their research and use the printed accounts of other authors rather than the original records.
Then there are proofreading, editing, typesetting & printing steps that can all allow small or even large errors to creap into a publication. (We won't mention

the efforts of some authors, publishers and editors to emphasize a particular version of an account to create contoversy and increase sales.) There are ALWAYS personal biases and viewpoints that also color an account. I am more prone to accept certain information over other information, all things being equal, etc.
No, I am not defending the authors, just noting why it is best to go back to the original sources whenever possible. An try to be as objective of their interpretation.
G is correct, some sources are more valid than others as are some testimony. The challenge is determining which is which.
"Take what you want...."
Ken
<message edited by Ken a B24 Fan on 07/25/2006 06:47:19 AM >
Ken Alexander
Son of 1st Lt. Clair B. Alexander Jr.
Pilot, B-24s: 10/12/1944 - 04/24/1945
15th AF, 49th Wing, 461st BG, 764th BS
Torretta Airfield, Cerignola, Italy