Combat Units and
Combat Squadrons are not the best sources for an "Emblem: None" entry. A number of emblems were approved during WW II for the eighty-odd squadrons that were allotted to the National Guard in 1946. The regular AF with regards to ANG historical materials pretty much takes a hands-off approach and many of these emblems are omitted in
Combat Squadrons. If you can find a copy of Fahey's
Army and Air Force Fighters, you can see several of these.
In the early 1990s, the Chief of Staff of the USAF took a personal interest in emblems, changing some of the rules. Among the changes he made was replacing some newer emblems with WW II emblems. In some cases, this was done officially and in others the old emblems were adopted as "heritage" emblems. Some of these were emblems that were not listed in
Combat Squadrons or
Combat Units. Some had been replaced, but others were listed as "none."
Since the early 1990s, USAF emblems have been the responsibility of the historians. Prior to that date, they were the responsibility of the personnel office, who had less motivation to retain really old files. Yes, there were many unapproved emblems (my squadron in Viet Nam, for example, used an emblem from 1966-1972 that was never approved -- and under the rules at the time would not have been approved because its primary colors were green, brown, and white instead of blue and gold), but the entry that the AFHRA puts in L&H statements "none on file" is more accurate than "none." [/rant]
Bernie Shearon
Push the stick forward, the houses get bigger. Pull the stick back, the houses get smaller (unless you keep pulling -- then they get bigger again)